Real Estate and Landlord-Tenant Disputes

Real estate and landlord-tenant disputes in Florida span a range that goes from residential leasing matters at one end to complex commercial transactions and development disputes at the other. The subject matter is heavy with statutory framework, particularly under Chapter 83 for landlord-tenant matters and various provisions of the Florida real property statutes for transactional and title-related disputes. The specific case law is voluminous. And the practical dynamics in the mediation room vary substantially depending on whether the matter involves a residential tenant, a commercial tenant, a real estate developer, or a title claim between owners.

What follows is what I bring to the mediation or arbitration of real estate and landlord-tenant matters as a neutral with active commercial litigation experience in Florida, with particular attention to the commercial landlord-tenant matters and real property disputes that most often come to mediation and arbitration.

What these disputes actually involve.

Landlord-tenant disputes in Florida commercial practice principally involve commercial leasing matters governed by Chapter 83 Part I of the Florida Statutes. The subject matter includes disputes over rent, common area maintenance charges, tax and insurance escalations, holdover situations, disputes over the interpretation of assignment and sublease provisions, disputes over use restrictions and exclusive-use provisions in shopping center leases, personal guaranty enforcement in commercial contexts, and the specific procedural framework for commercial eviction and possession under Section 83.20 and adjacent provisions.

The broader real estate category includes disputes arising from purchase and sale transactions, title matters and adverse possession claims, easement and boundary disputes, disputes over restrictive covenants and homeowner and condominium association matters, construction defect claims in the real property context that overlap with the construction litigation category, disputes over broker commissions, and matters involving the enforcement or defense of mortgages and other real property security interests. Development-related disputes involving zoning, land use, and permitting appear less frequently in commercial mediation but do arise in specific matters.

Why active litigation experience matters in these matters.

Real estate and landlord-tenant law in Florida is substantially statutory, and the statutes have specific applications that a neutral either knows from practice or does not. What is the current framework for the enforceability of rent acceleration provisions in commercial leases, and how are the appellate courts reading the mitigation obligations that follow? How does Section 83.232 of the Florida Statutes actually apply to commercial rent deposit requirements at the pleading stage, and what does the appellate case law say about the interaction of that provision with the substantive lease terms? What are the current standards for the enforceability of personal guaranties in commercial leasing, and how are trial courts handling the guaranty defenses that commercial guarantors typically raise?

In the real property context, the substantive law is similarly specific. What is the current framework for the doctrine of equitable subrogation in Florida real property disputes? How are the appellate courts handling adverse possession claims after the 2011 statutory revisions to Chapter 95? What does the current case law say about the enforceability of no-oral-modification provisions in real estate contracts under the doctrine of promissory estoppel? These are working questions that a neutral with current practice exposure can address and that a neutral without such exposure cannot.

How commercial landlord-tenant matters settle differently.

Commercial landlord-tenant mediations produce settlement dynamics that residential and consumer-context mediators sometimes underappreciate. Both sides usually have interests beyond the accrued rent claim on the face of the demand. The landlord frequently has an interest in keeping the tenant in the space because vacant commercial space is more expensive to the landlord than a reduced rent stream. The tenant frequently has an interest in preserving the business location because relocating a going commercial concern is expensive and disruptive in ways that the accrued rent number does not capture. The personal guaranty on the commercial lease is often more negotiable than either side initially assumes.

These are the dynamics that make the commercial landlord-tenant category particularly amenable to mediation when the neutral understands them. A settlement structure that reduces going-forward rent, defers accrued arrearages against payment over time, and modifies specific lease provisions to reflect the parties' actual current business relationship often produces a resolution that both sides prefer to the alternative of eviction, vacant space, and collection litigation. Neutrals who understand this dynamic can propose settlement architecture that unlocks resolutions the parties would not have reached on their own. The article on commercial landlord-tenant mediation develops this analysis in more detail.

What I bring to real estate and landlord-tenant matters as a neutral.

My commercial litigation practice has included real estate and commercial landlord-tenant disputes for more than thirty-seven years. I have handled commercial leasing matters across the range of subject matter, real property transactional disputes, title and boundary disputes, and mortgage and secured-transaction matters in the real property context. The litigation practice remains fully active.

What I bring to the mediation of a real estate or landlord-tenant matter is a working understanding of the substantive Florida statutory and case law, an appreciation for the settlement dynamics that make commercial landlord-tenant matters particularly amenable to negotiated resolution, and the practical experience with the range of settlement structures that work in real property disputes. What I bring to the arbitration of a real property matter is the same substantive framework applied to the adjudicative role.

Counsel handling real estate or landlord-tenant matters in mediation or arbitration who want to discuss a specific case are welcome to reach out. Consultations before a matter is set are not billed.

About the Neutral

Alex P. Rosenthal

Alex P. Rosenthal is the principal of Rosenthal Law Group in Weston, Florida, a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator, and a Florida Certified Arbitrator. He has practiced commercial litigation throughout Florida for more than thirty-seven years, with appellate practice in all six Florida District Courts of Appeal, the Florida Supreme Court, and the Eleventh Circuit. He is an independent neutral on the panel of National Arbitration and Mediation.

Engagements for mediation and arbitration may be requested through rosenthalresolutions.com or by direct contact at alex@rosenthalresolutions.com or 954.384.9200.